- LUMINAR 2018 VS ACDSEE PHOTO STUDIO ULTIMATE FULL
- LUMINAR 2018 VS ACDSEE PHOTO STUDIO ULTIMATE SOFTWARE
- LUMINAR 2018 VS ACDSEE PHOTO STUDIO ULTIMATE SIMULATOR
All over now? Not remotely: there's a vast amount of intellectual property to be sold off, including these apps. Then what happens? We all forget PS and LR ever existed? Darn, that's it. Apple going bust would not have stopped any machine working. But calmer heads then made points that are equally relevant now. Which elephant is this? If Adobe go bust then LR still works perfectly to well to allow you to get all your images out of it - just like if you let your subscription lapse.īut we had all this end-of-the-world stuff back in the 90s when it looked like Apple might fold. Unless we're supposed to ignore the elephant in the room.
LUMINAR 2018 VS ACDSEE PHOTO STUDIO ULTIMATE SOFTWARE
This is the reason why betting on less well known software is risky. are all now as good as commercial software. Over time, open source software made phenomenal progress. GIMP) is actually destined to last longer (than less well known software) because of feel good community feeling. Libre Office is compatible with DOCX, XLSX, PPTX.
LUMINAR 2018 VS ACDSEE PHOTO STUDIO ULTIMATE SIMULATOR
When Microsoft stopped supporting it, another venture called Openrails released free software which were compatible with MS Train Simulator routes. If Adobe goes bust (in unlikely scenario) due to huge number of people using their products, someone will release something which will be compatible with Adobe products.Īn example is Microsoft Train Simulator. If they go bust (and they often do) you will be out of luck. Where as in developing countries people choose from #1, #2 and #3. In developed countries people usually choose between #1 and #3. It does not matter as much what features are offered by a software, rather it is important to consider overall ecosystem it offers.Īdobe products have huge ecosystem because of not just #1 but #2. #2 is not something we discuss here but it is a reality Customers using free/open source software Customers using bootleg copies of commercial softwareģ. Customers paying for commercial softwareĢ. There are following types of users and product combinations.ġ. Hello Jonsi, you know that I know that you know what I mean. but.your title was about customer service, yet your rant was about software. I mean, it was subtle, though I think we may have it figured out. Unfortunately, the one place they failed to invest, is in the product itself. Their management probably spent most of their time, effort and investors money on marketing, cocktails, R&D, package design and finding an outsourced developer who would magically produce a software correctly first time. Indeed, slick website, nicely filled with grand notions of their vision for a modern and easier image processing experience. It delivers the goods.Īka the 'Kickstarter'. N.B: Apart from lack of communication, tutorials and other marketing goodies, I have nothing bad to say about ACDSee for the price at least. but failing miserably in marketing / selling their product and communicating.
LUMINAR 2018 VS ACDSEE PHOTO STUDIO ULTIMATE FULL
Well-established company offering a very strong DAM for decades, now extending to a full on suite from DAM, to RAW conversion, to Retouching and delivering a fantastic quality / price ratio. Hello, trying to illustrate a frustration with both soft companies, both taking completely opposite paths but both going nowhere near Customer satisfactionįrustrating, as both are serious alternatives to the oligopoly of Adobe.
0 kommentar(er)
